Anti-EEF2K antibody [EP881Y] (ab45168)
Key features and details
- Rabbit monoclonal [EP881Y] to EEF2K
- Suitable for: WB
- Knockout validated
- Reacts with: Human
- Isotype: IgG
Overview
-
Product name
Anti-EEF2K antibody [EP881Y]
See all EEF2K primary antibodies -
Description
Rabbit monoclonal [EP881Y] to EEF2K -
Host species
Rabbit -
Tested Applications & Species
See all applications and species dataApplication Species WB Human -
Immunogen
Synthetic peptide within Human EEF2K aa 700-800 (C terminal). The exact sequence is proprietary.
-
General notes
Our RabMAb® technology is a patented hybridoma-based technology for making rabbit monoclonal antibodies. For details on our patents, please refer to RabMAb® patents.
Properties
-
Form
Liquid -
Storage instructions
Shipped at 4°C. Upon delivery aliquot and store at -20°C. Avoid freeze / thaw cycles. -
Storage buffer
pH: 7.20
Preservative: 0.05% Sodium azide
Constituents: 99% Tissue culture supernatant, 0.1% BSA -
Concentration information loading...
-
Purity
Tissue culture supernatant -
Clonality
Monoclonal -
Clone number
EP881Y -
Isotype
IgG -
Research areas
Images
-
Lane 1: Wild-type HAP1 cell lysate (20 µg)
Lane 2: EEF2K knockout HAP1 cell lysate (20 µg)
Lane 3: HeLa cell lysate (20 µg)
Lane 4: Jurkat cell lysate (20 µg)
Lanes 1 - 4: Merged signal (red and green). Green - ab45168 observed at 95 kDa. Red - loading control, ab8245, observed at 37 kDa.
ab45168 was shown to specifically react with EEF2K when EEF2K knockout samples were used. Wild-type and EEF2K knockout samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE. ab45168 and ab8245 (loading control to GAPDH) were diluted 1/1000 and 1/10000 respectively and incubated overnight at 4°C. Blots were developed with Goat anti-Rabbit IgG H&L (IRDye® 800CW) preadsorbed (ab216773) and Goat anti-Mouse IgG H&L (IRDye® 680RD) preadsorbed (ab216776) secondary antibodies at 1/10000 dilution for 1 h at room temperature before imaging. -
Anti-EEF2K antibody [EP881Y] (ab45168) at 1/1000 dilution + HEK293 cell lysate
Predicted band size: 82 kDa
Observed band size: 95 kDa why is the actual band size different from the predicted?